Open-source workflow automation tool, self-hostable to escape per-task SaaS pricing.
▲ 18
Visit →
n8n vs Make
Comparing n8n and Make to help you pick the right Automation Tools for your needs.
| Feature | n8n | Make |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |
| Platforms | Web | Web |
| Starting price | $0 | $0 |
| Community votes | 18 | 334 |
n8n Pros & Cons
- Free if self-hosted, avoiding Zapier's or Make's per-task pricing entirely, which can scale unpredictably as automation volume grows
- Open-source codebase means full control, transparency, and no vendor lock-in tied to one company's continued business decisions
- Self-hosting keeps workflow data and credentials on infrastructure the business controls, relevant for data sensitivity or compliance concerns
- Supports custom code nodes for advanced logic that purely visual, no-code competitors handle less flexibly
- Active open-source community contributes integrations and workflow templates beyond what the core team builds alone
- Self-hosting requires real technical setup (server provisioning, maintenance, updates) most non-developers won't want to do themselves
- Smaller library of pre-built app integrations than Zapier's much larger, more established marketplace
- Basic workflows can be built visually without code, but the most advanced use cases benefit from real developer familiarity
- Cloud-hosted option, while removing the self-hosting burden, narrows the cost advantage over Zapier or Make at lower automation volumes
Make Pros & Cons
- Visual node-based editor handles complex branching logic more clearly than linear workflow builders
- Generally lower cost per operation than Zapier at comparable usage volumes
- Built-in data transformation tools reduce the need for separate processing steps
- Supports loops and iterative logic that simpler automation tools struggle to represent
- Strong for technically inclined users building genuinely complex multi-step automations
- Steeper learning curve than Zapier's more straightforward linear workflow model
- Smaller app integration catalog than Zapier's more extensive marketplace
- Visual complexity can become difficult to manage for very large automation scenarios
- Less suited to users wanting the simplest possible automation setup experience
- Documentation and community resources are less extensive than Zapier's larger user base
Verdict: n8n vs Make
n8n and Make both serve the Automation Tools category well, but suit different priorities. Based on community engagement, Make is currently the more widely adopted choice (334 votes), but the better fit ultimately depends on your specific pricing, platform, and feature requirements.
Frequently Asked Questions
- Which is cheaper, n8n or Make?
- n8n and Make use a similar pricing model (both freemium), so the cheaper choice depends on which specific plan tier and feature set you need rather than the base pricing model.
- Is n8n or Make rated higher?
- n8n and Make currently hold comparable editorial ratings, so neither has a clear edge — the right pick depends more on which specific features and pricing fit your use case.
- Which platforms do n8n and Make support?
- n8n is available on Web. Make is available on Web. Both tools cover a similar range of platforms.
- Can I switch from n8n to Make (or vice versa)?
- Most automation tools tools, including n8n and Make, support data export in standard formats, making migration possible though rarely fully automatic. Expect to manually verify that custom configurations, integrations, and historical data transfer correctly, and budget time for the team to adjust to workflow differences between the two products.
- Should I choose n8n or Make?
- n8n and Make both serve the Automation Tools category well, but suit different priorities. Based on community engagement, Make is currently the more widely adopted choice (334 votes), but the better fit ultimately depends on your specific pricing, platform, and feature requirements.