Visual collaboration whiteboard built around GDPR compliance and on-premises data privacy.
▲ 8
Visit →
Conceptboard vs FigJam
Comparing Conceptboard and FigJam to help you pick the right Digital Whiteboards for your needs.
| Feature | Conceptboard | FigJam |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |
| Platforms | Web | Web, macOS, Windows |
| Editorial rating | ★ 3.8 / 5 | ★ 4.2 / 5 |
| Starting price | $0/month | $0 |
| Community votes | 8 | 367 |
Conceptboard Pros & Cons
- Strong, genuine focus on GDPR compliance and data residency, directly addressing privacy-sensitive organizations' compliance concerns
- On-premises hosting option provides infrastructure-level data control not commonly offered by competitors like Miro
- European data center options matter specifically for organizations with strict data sovereignty requirements
- Core whiteboard functionality covers standard collaborative use cases (sticky notes, diagrams, freeform drawing) competently
- Affordable Team tier pricing relative to more mainstream whiteboard competitors at comparable functionality
- Smaller user base and community-contributed template library than Miro or FigJam's much larger ecosystems
- Less brand recognition translates to fewer pre-built third-party integrations than more established, mainstream competitors
- Free tier's 3-board limit is restrictive for any regular ongoing use
- Less innovative pace of new feature development than larger, more heavily funded competitors like Miro
FigJam Pros & Cons
- Tight integration with Figma design files lets teams move between whiteboarding and design seamlessly
- Same account and billing as Figma simplifies adoption for existing Figma customers
- Real-time collaboration quality matches Figma's well-regarded multiplayer editing experience
- Lower individual editor pricing than Miro's comparable tiers
- Templates oriented toward design and product workflows specifically
- Less mature general-purpose template library than Miro for non-design-adjacent use cases
- Most valuable specifically for teams already using Figma, less compelling as a standalone purchase
- Smaller overall feature set than Miro's more whiteboarding-focused product investment
- Some advanced Miro-specific features (certain integrations, advanced diagramming) aren't matched
- Less brand recognition in pure whiteboarding context compared to Miro's category leadership
Verdict: Conceptboard vs FigJam
Conceptboard and FigJam both serve the Digital Whiteboards category well, but suit different priorities. FigJam carries the stronger editorial rating (4.2 / 5), FigJam supports more platforms (3 vs 1). Based on community engagement, FigJam is currently the more widely adopted choice (367 votes), but the better fit ultimately depends on your specific pricing, platform, and feature requirements.
Frequently Asked Questions
- Which is cheaper, Conceptboard or FigJam?
- Conceptboard and FigJam use a similar pricing model (both freemium), so the cheaper choice depends on which specific plan tier and feature set you need rather than the base pricing model.
- Is Conceptboard or FigJam rated higher?
- FigJam has the higher editorial rating at 4.2 out of 5, compared to Conceptboard's 3.8 out of 5. This is Kreemhunt's own staff rating, not a public user aggregate — review the pros and cons below for specifics that matter to your use case.
- Which platforms do Conceptboard and FigJam support?
- Conceptboard is available on Web. FigJam is available on Web, macOS, Windows. FigJam covers more platforms overall, which matters if your team works across a wider range of devices and operating systems.
- Can I switch from Conceptboard to FigJam (or vice versa)?
- Most digital whiteboards tools, including Conceptboard and FigJam, support data export in standard formats, making migration possible though rarely fully automatic. Expect to manually verify that custom configurations, integrations, and historical data transfer correctly, and budget time for the team to adjust to workflow differences between the two products.
- Should I choose Conceptboard or FigJam?
- Conceptboard and FigJam both serve the Digital Whiteboards category well, but suit different priorities. FigJam carries the stronger editorial rating (4.2 / 5), FigJam supports more platforms (3 vs 1). Based on community engagement, FigJam is currently the more widely adopted choice (367 votes), but the better fit ultimately depends on your specific pricing, platform, and feature requirements.