Applicant tracking system built for small and mid-sized hiring teams, with one-click multi-board job posting.
▲ 12
Visit →
Workable vs Greenhouse
Comparing Workable and Greenhouse to help you pick the right Hiring Software for your needs.
Enterprise-grade applicant tracking and hiring software.
▲ 143
Visit →
| Feature | Workable | Greenhouse |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Paid | Paid |
| Platforms | Web, iOS, Android | Web |
| Editorial rating | ★ 4 / 5 | ★ 4 / 5 |
| Starting price | $169/month | Custom |
| Community votes | 12 | 143 |
Workable Pros & Cons
- One-click posting to dozens of job boards from a single dashboard, eliminating the tedious manual work of posting separately to each board
- Easier and faster to set up than enterprise-focused ATS tools like Greenhouse, accessible without a dedicated recruiting operations specialist
- Candidate pipeline management gives hiring teams clear visibility into where each applicant stands without manual spreadsheet tracking
- Interview scheduling tools reduce the back-and-forth coordination overhead of arranging candidate interviews across multiple interviewers
- Mobile apps let hiring managers review candidates and provide feedback away from a desktop computer
- No free tier, requiring meaningful upfront commitment even for smaller companies just starting to formalize their hiring process
- Less customizable workflow and approval chains than Greenhouse, which matters more as hiring complexity and organizational size grow
- Less suited to very large enterprises with complex, multi-stage approval hierarchies across many departments
- Reporting depth, while solid for small-to-mid-sized needs, doesn't match the most enterprise-grade analytics tools built for larger organizations
Greenhouse Pros & Cons
- Structured interview kits genuinely help reduce inconsistent, biased hiring decisions
- Large integrations marketplace connects with most major HR and assessment tools
- Strong reporting and hiring analytics for tracking pipeline health
- Scales well for companies hiring at volume across multiple teams
- Pricing is quote-based and generally positioned for mid-size to large companies, not solo hiring
- Can feel like overkill for startups making just a handful of hires per year
- Implementation and onboarding require real setup time
Verdict: Workable vs Greenhouse
Workable and Greenhouse both serve the Hiring Software category well, but suit different priorities. Workable supports more platforms (3 vs 1). Based on community engagement, Greenhouse is currently the more widely adopted choice (143 votes), but the better fit ultimately depends on your specific pricing, platform, and feature requirements.
Frequently Asked Questions
- Which is cheaper, Workable or Greenhouse?
- Workable and Greenhouse use a similar pricing model (both paid), so the cheaper choice depends on which specific plan tier and feature set you need rather than the base pricing model.
- Is Workable or Greenhouse rated higher?
- Workable and Greenhouse currently hold comparable editorial ratings, so neither has a clear edge — the right pick depends more on which specific features and pricing fit your use case.
- Which platforms do Workable and Greenhouse support?
- Workable is available on Web, iOS, Android. Greenhouse is available on Web. Workable covers more platforms overall, which matters if your team works across a wider range of devices and operating systems.
- Can I switch from Workable to Greenhouse (or vice versa)?
- Most hiring software tools, including Workable and Greenhouse, support data export in standard formats, making migration possible though rarely fully automatic. Expect to manually verify that custom configurations, integrations, and historical data transfer correctly, and budget time for the team to adjust to workflow differences between the two products.
- Should I choose Workable or Greenhouse?
- Workable and Greenhouse both serve the Hiring Software category well, but suit different priorities. Workable supports more platforms (3 vs 1). Based on community engagement, Greenhouse is currently the more widely adopted choice (143 votes), but the better fit ultimately depends on your specific pricing, platform, and feature requirements.