Head-to-head comparison

Toggl Track vs Harvest

Comparing Toggl Track and Harvest to help you pick the right Time Tracking Apps for your needs.

Feature Toggl Track Harvest
Pricing Freemium Freemium
Platforms Web, macOS, Windows, Linux, iOS, Android Web, macOS, Windows, iOS, Android
Launched 2006 2006
Starting price $0 $0
Community votes 389 312

Toggl Track Pros & Cons

  • One-click timer start/stop with minimal friction encourages consistent, accurate tracking
  • Generous free tier supports up to 5 users with unlimited time tracking
  • Clean, exportable reports suitable for client invoicing and internal analysis
  • Browser extension and desktop apps make starting a timer from any context simple
  • Integrates with many project management and invoicing tools to avoid duplicate data entry
  • Lacks built-in invoicing — requires exporting data to a separate billing tool
  • Less suited to detailed project management than tools that bundle time tracking with task management
  • Manual time entry correction is needed if a timer is accidentally left running
  • Some advanced reporting and forecasting features require Premium tier
  • Team-wide adoption requires individual discipline, since accurate tracking depends on actually starting timers

Harvest Pros & Cons

  • Built-in invoicing eliminates the export-to-separate-tool step that Toggl Track requires
  • Expense tracking alongside time tracking covers more of a consultant or agency's billing needs in one platform
  • Clean reporting specifically oriented toward client billing and profitability analysis
  • Integrates with popular accounting software (QuickBooks, Xero) for further reconciliation
  • Long track record with consulting and agency businesses specifically
  • Less tool-agnostic than Toggl Track, assuming you want Harvest's specific invoicing workflow
  • Free tier's 2-project limit is restrictive for active freelancers or agencies with more clients
  • Per-seat pricing for Pro adds up for larger teams compared to some competitors
  • Less flexible for users who already use a separate, preferred invoicing or accounting tool
  • Fewer third-party integrations beyond billing-adjacent tools compared to broader automation platforms

Verdict: Toggl Track vs Harvest

Toggl Track and Harvest both serve the Time Tracking Apps category well, but suit different priorities. Toggl Track supports more platforms (6 vs 5). Based on community engagement, Toggl Track is currently the more widely adopted choice (389 votes), but the better fit ultimately depends on your specific pricing, platform, and feature requirements.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Toggl Track or Harvest?
Toggl Track and Harvest use a similar pricing model (both freemium), so the cheaper choice depends on which specific plan tier and feature set you need rather than the base pricing model.
Is Toggl Track or Harvest rated higher?
Toggl Track and Harvest currently hold comparable editorial ratings, so neither has a clear edge — the right pick depends more on which specific features and pricing fit your use case.
Which platforms do Toggl Track and Harvest support?
Toggl Track is available on Web, macOS, Windows, Linux, iOS, Android. Harvest is available on Web, macOS, Windows, iOS, Android. Toggl Track covers more platforms overall, which matters if your team works across a wider range of devices and operating systems.
Can I switch from Toggl Track to Harvest (or vice versa)?
Most time tracking apps tools, including Toggl Track and Harvest, support data export in standard formats, making migration possible though rarely fully automatic. Expect to manually verify that custom configurations, integrations, and historical data transfer correctly, and budget time for the team to adjust to workflow differences between the two products.
Should I choose Toggl Track or Harvest?
Toggl Track and Harvest both serve the Time Tracking Apps category well, but suit different priorities. Toggl Track supports more platforms (6 vs 5). Based on community engagement, Toggl Track is currently the more widely adopted choice (389 votes), but the better fit ultimately depends on your specific pricing, platform, and feature requirements.