One-click time tracking with minimal friction and clean reporting.
▲ 389
Visit →
Toggl Track vs Harvest
Comparing Toggl Track and Harvest to help you pick the right Time Tracking Apps for your needs.
| Feature | Toggl Track | Harvest |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |
| Platforms | Web, macOS, Windows, Linux, iOS, Android | Web, macOS, Windows, iOS, Android |
| Editorial rating | ★ 4 / 5 | ★ 4 / 5 |
| Launched | 2006 | 2006 |
| Starting price | $0 | $0 |
| Community votes | 389 | 312 |
Toggl Track Pros & Cons
- One-click timer start/stop with minimal friction encourages consistent, accurate tracking
- Generous free tier supports up to 5 users with unlimited time tracking
- Clean, exportable reports suitable for client invoicing and internal analysis
- Browser extension and desktop apps make starting a timer from any context simple
- Integrates with many project management and invoicing tools to avoid duplicate data entry
- Lacks built-in invoicing — requires exporting data to a separate billing tool
- Less suited to detailed project management than tools that bundle time tracking with task management
- Manual time entry correction is needed if a timer is accidentally left running
- Some advanced reporting and forecasting features require Premium tier
- Team-wide adoption requires individual discipline, since accurate tracking depends on actually starting timers
Harvest Pros & Cons
- Built-in invoicing eliminates the export-to-separate-tool step that Toggl Track requires
- Expense tracking alongside time tracking covers more of a consultant or agency's billing needs in one platform
- Clean reporting specifically oriented toward client billing and profitability analysis
- Integrates with popular accounting software (QuickBooks, Xero) for further reconciliation
- Long track record with consulting and agency businesses specifically
- Less tool-agnostic than Toggl Track, assuming you want Harvest's specific invoicing workflow
- Free tier's 2-project limit is restrictive for active freelancers or agencies with more clients
- Per-seat pricing for Pro adds up for larger teams compared to some competitors
- Less flexible for users who already use a separate, preferred invoicing or accounting tool
- Fewer third-party integrations beyond billing-adjacent tools compared to broader automation platforms
Verdict: Toggl Track vs Harvest
Harvest wins for freelancers and agencies that bill clients hourly and want invoicing built into the same tool as time tracking. Toggl Track wins for teams that want the best pure time tracking experience and handle billing through a separate tool.
Frequently Asked Questions
- Which is cheaper, Toggl Track or Harvest?
- Toggl Track and Harvest use a similar pricing model (both freemium), so the cheaper choice depends on which specific plan tier and feature set you need rather than the base pricing model.
- Is Toggl Track or Harvest rated higher?
- Toggl Track and Harvest currently hold comparable editorial ratings, so neither has a clear edge — the right pick depends more on which specific features and pricing fit your use case.
- Which platforms do Toggl Track and Harvest support?
- Toggl Track is available on Web, macOS, Windows, Linux, iOS, Android. Harvest is available on Web, macOS, Windows, iOS, Android. Toggl Track covers more platforms overall, which matters if your team works across a wider range of devices and operating systems.
- Can I switch from Toggl Track to Harvest (or vice versa)?
- Most time tracking apps tools, including Toggl Track and Harvest, support data export in standard formats, making migration possible though rarely fully automatic. Expect to manually verify that custom configurations, integrations, and historical data transfer correctly, and budget time for the team to adjust to workflow differences between the two products.
- Should I choose Toggl Track or Harvest?
- Harvest wins for freelancers and agencies that bill clients hourly and want invoicing built into the same tool as time tracking. Toggl Track wins for teams that want the best pure time tracking experience and handle billing through a separate tool.