Enterprise background screening provider with global, multi-country coverage.
▲ 9
Visit →
Sterling vs Checkr
Comparing Sterling and Checkr to help you pick the right Background Check Software for your needs.
| Feature | Sterling | Checkr |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Paid | Paid |
| Platforms | Web | Web |
| Editorial rating | ★ 4 / 5 | ★ 4.1 / 5 |
| Starting price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Community votes | 9 | 14 |
Sterling Pros & Cons
- Strong global coverage for multi-country background checks, a meaningful differentiator from providers focused primarily on domestic US screening
- Established enterprise track record with decades of operating history in the screening industry
- Compliance infrastructure built around navigating varying international employment and privacy regulations across jurisdictions
- Wide range of check types beyond basic criminal records — employment verification, education verification, credit checks, and industry-specific screening
- Dedicated account support typical of enterprise vendor relationships, useful for large HR teams needing hands-on assistance
- Pricing isn't published and is generally enterprise-scale, requiring a sales conversation rather than self-service signup or per-check transparency
- Overkill for small businesses with simple, domestic-only hiring needs that don't require international screening capability
- Less developer-friendly/API-first than Checkr for companies wanting to build background checks directly into a high-volume automated hiring flow
- Onboarding and account setup for enterprise contracts typically takes longer than simpler, self-service competitors
Checkr Pros & Cons
- API-first design makes integration into existing hiring, onboarding, or gig-platform systems straightforward for engineering teams
- Fast turnaround times suited specifically to high-volume hiring where applicant wait time directly affects conversion
- Adverse action workflow tools help employers stay compliant with FCRA requirements when a check comes back with findings
- Widely used by major gig-economy platforms, giving it real-world scale validation beyond typical enterprise software
- Candidate-facing experience (status updates, dispute process) is generally well-regarded compared to older, less transparent background check providers
- Pricing isn't published and is generally structured around volume, making it less transparent for smaller or occasional users
- Less suited to a small business doing occasional, one-off hiring than per-check tools like GoodHire
- API-first design assumes engineering resources to integrate — less turnkey than a simple web dashboard for non-technical HR teams
- Turnaround times, while generally fast, can still vary based on county/court record availability for certain check types
Verdict: Sterling vs Checkr
Sterling and Checkr both serve the Background Check Software category well, but suit different priorities. Checkr carries the stronger editorial rating (4.1 / 5), Based on community engagement, Checkr is currently the more widely adopted choice (14 votes), but the better fit ultimately depends on your specific pricing, platform, and feature requirements.
Frequently Asked Questions
- Which is cheaper, Sterling or Checkr?
- Sterling and Checkr use a similar pricing model (both paid), so the cheaper choice depends on which specific plan tier and feature set you need rather than the base pricing model.
- Is Sterling or Checkr rated higher?
- Checkr has the higher editorial rating at 4.1 out of 5, compared to Sterling's 4 out of 5. This is Kreemhunt's own staff rating, not a public user aggregate — review the pros and cons below for specifics that matter to your use case.
- Which platforms do Sterling and Checkr support?
- Sterling is available on Web. Checkr is available on Web. Both tools cover a similar range of platforms.
- Can I switch from Sterling to Checkr (or vice versa)?
- Most background check software tools, including Sterling and Checkr, support data export in standard formats, making migration possible though rarely fully automatic. Expect to manually verify that custom configurations, integrations, and historical data transfer correctly, and budget time for the team to adjust to workflow differences between the two products.
- Should I choose Sterling or Checkr?
- Sterling and Checkr both serve the Background Check Software category well, but suit different priorities. Checkr carries the stronger editorial rating (4.1 / 5), Based on community engagement, Checkr is currently the more widely adopted choice (14 votes), but the better fit ultimately depends on your specific pricing, platform, and feature requirements.