Simple screen recording and video editing, with a genuinely usable free desktop app.
▲ 287
Visit →
ScreenPal vs Loom
Comparing ScreenPal and Loom to help you pick the right Screenshots & Screen Recording for your needs.
| Feature | ScreenPal | Loom |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |
| Platforms | Web, macOS, Windows, iOS, Android | Web, macOS, Windows, iOS, Android |
| Editorial rating | ★ 4 / 5 | ★ 4.4 / 5 |
| Launched | 2006 | 2016 |
| Starting price | $0 | $0 |
| Community votes | 287 | 445 |
ScreenPal Pros & Cons
- Significantly lower pricing than Loom at comparable feature tiers
- Long history serving educators and trainers has produced a polished instructional content workflow
- Lightweight desktop app doesn't require a constant internet connection for recording
- Basic video editing tools handle common needs without requiring separate software
- Genuinely usable free tier for occasional recording needs
- Less polished sharing and team collaboration features than Loom
- No AI-generated summaries or transcripts comparable to Loom's AI Companion
- Smaller brand recognition and ecosystem than more prominent competitors
- Free tier's 15-minute recording cap is more restrictive than some alternatives
- Interface feels less modern than newer screen recording competitors
Loom Pros & Cons
- Eliminates many meetings by letting people explain things asynchronously on their own schedule
- One-click recording and instant shareable link — minimal friction to start
- Automatic transcription and AI-generated summaries save viewers time
- Viewer engagement analytics show who watched and how much, unlike a live meeting
- Works equally well for internal team communication and external customer-facing videos
- Free tier's 5-minute recording limit is restrictive for longer walkthroughs
- Per-creator pricing on Business can add up for teams where many people need to record
- Asynchronous video can't replace real-time discussion for complex, interactive problem-solving
- Video messages can pile up if not actively managed, similar to email overload
- Less suited to highly interactive or sensitive conversations than synchronous video calls
Verdict: ScreenPal vs Loom
Loom wins on sharing experience and viewer analytics; ScreenPal wins on price and editing capabilities. Teams wanting quick async video messaging choose Loom; budget-conscious users wanting more editing control choose ScreenPal.
Frequently Asked Questions
- Which is cheaper, ScreenPal or Loom?
- ScreenPal and Loom use a similar pricing model (both freemium), so the cheaper choice depends on which specific plan tier and feature set you need rather than the base pricing model.
- Is ScreenPal or Loom rated higher?
- Loom has the higher editorial rating at 4.4 out of 5, compared to ScreenPal's 4 out of 5. This is Kreemhunt's own staff rating, not a public user aggregate — review the pros and cons below for specifics that matter to your use case.
- Which platforms do ScreenPal and Loom support?
- ScreenPal is available on Web, macOS, Windows, iOS, Android. Loom is available on Web, macOS, Windows, iOS, Android. Both tools cover a similar range of platforms.
- Can I switch from ScreenPal to Loom (or vice versa)?
- Most screenshots & screen recording tools, including ScreenPal and Loom, support data export in standard formats, making migration possible though rarely fully automatic. Expect to manually verify that custom configurations, integrations, and historical data transfer correctly, and budget time for the team to adjust to workflow differences between the two products.
- Should I choose ScreenPal or Loom?
- Loom wins on sharing experience and viewer analytics; ScreenPal wins on price and editing capabilities. Teams wanting quick async video messaging choose Loom; budget-conscious users wanting more editing control choose ScreenPal.