Enterprise identity and access management platform built for complex hybrid infrastructure.
▲ 9
Visit →
Ping Identity vs OneLogin
Comparing Ping Identity and OneLogin to help you pick the right Single Sign-On Software for your needs.
| Feature | Ping Identity | OneLogin |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Paid | Paid |
| Platforms | Web | Web, iOS, Android |
| Editorial rating | ★ 4 / 5 | ★ 3.9 / 5 |
| Starting price | Contact sales | $4/month per user |
| Community votes | 9 | 11 |
Ping Identity Pros & Cons
- Strong support for complex hybrid cloud/on-premises identity environments, addressing a real need most cloud-native-only competitors don't serve as directly
- Established enterprise track record and extensive compliance certifications, valuable for organizations in regulated industries
- Identity governance capabilities go beyond basic SSO into more sophisticated access policy management for large, complex organizations
- Built specifically for the operational reality of large enterprises still running significant legacy infrastructure alongside modern cloud systems
- Deep configurability supports the kind of complex, customized identity policies large organizations with intricate access requirements need
OneLogin Pros & Cons
- Generally priced lower than Okta at comparable feature tiers, a meaningful consideration for budget-conscious mid-market organizations
- Solid catalog of pre-built SSO integrations covering common business applications without requiring custom integration work
- Core SSO and MFA functionality covers the fundamental identity management needs most organizations require
- Mobile apps support identity management and authentication on the go for distributed or remote workforces
- Smaller app integration marketplace and overall brand recognition than Okta's much larger, more established presence
- Some users report a less polished, less intuitive admin interface than Okta's more refined administrative experience
- Less extensive advanced enterprise features than Okta for very large, complex organizational identity needs
- Acquisition by One Identity introduces some uncertainty about long-term product direction and integration priorities
Verdict: Ping Identity vs OneLogin
Ping Identity and OneLogin both serve the Single Sign-On Software category well, but suit different priorities. Ping Identity carries the stronger editorial rating (4 / 5), OneLogin supports more platforms (3 vs 1). Based on community engagement, OneLogin is currently the more widely adopted choice (11 votes), but the better fit ultimately depends on your specific pricing, platform, and feature requirements.
Frequently Asked Questions
- Which is cheaper, Ping Identity or OneLogin?
- Ping Identity and OneLogin use a similar pricing model (both paid), so the cheaper choice depends on which specific plan tier and feature set you need rather than the base pricing model.
- Is Ping Identity or OneLogin rated higher?
- Ping Identity has the higher editorial rating at 4 out of 5, compared to OneLogin's 3.9 out of 5. This is Kreemhunt's own staff rating, not a public user aggregate — review the pros and cons below for specifics that matter to your use case.
- Which platforms do Ping Identity and OneLogin support?
- Ping Identity is available on Web. OneLogin is available on Web, iOS, Android. OneLogin covers more platforms overall, which matters if your team works across a wider range of devices and operating systems.
- Can I switch from Ping Identity to OneLogin (or vice versa)?
- Most single sign-on software tools, including Ping Identity and OneLogin, support data export in standard formats, making migration possible though rarely fully automatic. Expect to manually verify that custom configurations, integrations, and historical data transfer correctly, and budget time for the team to adjust to workflow differences between the two products.
- Should I choose Ping Identity or OneLogin?
- Ping Identity and OneLogin both serve the Single Sign-On Software category well, but suit different priorities. Ping Identity carries the stronger editorial rating (4 / 5), OneLogin supports more platforms (3 vs 1). Based on community engagement, OneLogin is currently the more widely adopted choice (11 votes), but the better fit ultimately depends on your specific pricing, platform, and feature requirements.