Visual automation platform with AI steps for building complex multi-step workflows.
▲ 32
Visit →
Make vs Zapier
Comparing Make and Zapier to help you pick the right AI Workflow Automation for your needs.
| Feature | Make | Zapier |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |
| Platforms | Web | Web |
| Editorial rating | ★ 4.3 / 5 | ★ 4.5 / 5 |
| Starting price | $0 | $0 |
| Community votes | 32 | 612 |
Make Pros & Cons
- More complex workflow logic than Zapier with routers, iterators, and error handling
- More affordable per-operation pricing than Zapier at comparable workflow complexity
- Visual canvas shows complete workflow flow in a way linear Zapier steps do not
- Strong data transformation tools for manipulating data between steps
- Steeper learning curve than Zapier due to more complex interface
- Operation count can accumulate quickly in complex workflows with loops
- Less pre-built app integrations than Zapier, though covering most mainstream tools
Zapier Pros & Cons
- Largest app integration marketplace of any automation tool, with over 7,000 supported apps
- No coding required to build meaningful multi-step automations
- Mature, reliable platform with over a decade of production use across millions of workflows
- Custom logic (Paths) and filters allow conditional automation without scripting
- Free tier is genuinely usable for simple, low-volume automations
- Task-based pricing can become expensive quickly for high-volume automation needs
- Multi-step Zaps require a paid plan, limiting the free tier's practical usefulness
- Complex workflows with many branches can become difficult to debug visually
- Slower execution than code-based automation for time-sensitive workflows
- Per-task costs make Zapier less economical than custom code at very high automation volumes
Verdict: Make vs Zapier
Make and Zapier both serve the AI Workflow Automation category well, but suit different priorities. Zapier carries the stronger editorial rating (4.5 / 5), Based on community engagement, Zapier is currently the more widely adopted choice (612 votes), but the better fit ultimately depends on your specific pricing, platform, and feature requirements.
Frequently Asked Questions
- Which is cheaper, Make or Zapier?
- Make and Zapier use a similar pricing model (both freemium), so the cheaper choice depends on which specific plan tier and feature set you need rather than the base pricing model.
- Is Make or Zapier rated higher?
- Zapier has the higher editorial rating at 4.5 out of 5, compared to Make's 4.3 out of 5. This is Kreemhunt's own staff rating, not a public user aggregate — review the pros and cons below for specifics that matter to your use case.
- Which platforms do Make and Zapier support?
- Make is available on Web. Zapier is available on Web. Both tools cover a similar range of platforms.
- Can I switch from Make to Zapier (or vice versa)?
- Most ai workflow automation tools, including Make and Zapier, support data export in standard formats, making migration possible though rarely fully automatic. Expect to manually verify that custom configurations, integrations, and historical data transfer correctly, and budget time for the team to adjust to workflow differences between the two products.
- Should I choose Make or Zapier?
- Make and Zapier both serve the AI Workflow Automation category well, but suit different priorities. Zapier carries the stronger editorial rating (4.5 / 5), Based on community engagement, Zapier is currently the more widely adopted choice (612 votes), but the better fit ultimately depends on your specific pricing, platform, and feature requirements.