Visual automation platform with AI steps for building complex multi-step workflows.
▲ 32
Visit →
Make vs n8n
Comparing Make and n8n to help you pick the right AI Workflow Automation for your needs.
| Feature | Make | n8n |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |
| Platforms | Web | Web |
| Editorial rating | ★ 4.3 / 5 | ★ 4.2 / 5 |
| Starting price | $0 | $0 |
| Community votes | 32 | 18 |
Make Pros & Cons
- More complex workflow logic than Zapier with routers, iterators, and error handling
- More affordable per-operation pricing than Zapier at comparable workflow complexity
- Visual canvas shows complete workflow flow in a way linear Zapier steps do not
- Strong data transformation tools for manipulating data between steps
- Steeper learning curve than Zapier due to more complex interface
- Operation count can accumulate quickly in complex workflows with loops
- Less pre-built app integrations than Zapier, though covering most mainstream tools
n8n Pros & Cons
- Free if self-hosted, avoiding Zapier's or Make's per-task pricing entirely, which can scale unpredictably as automation volume grows
- Open-source codebase means full control, transparency, and no vendor lock-in tied to one company's continued business decisions
- Self-hosting keeps workflow data and credentials on infrastructure the business controls, relevant for data sensitivity or compliance concerns
- Supports custom code nodes for advanced logic that purely visual, no-code competitors handle less flexibly
- Active open-source community contributes integrations and workflow templates beyond what the core team builds alone
- Self-hosting requires real technical setup (server provisioning, maintenance, updates) most non-developers won't want to do themselves
- Smaller library of pre-built app integrations than Zapier's much larger, more established marketplace
- Basic workflows can be built visually without code, but the most advanced use cases benefit from real developer familiarity
- Cloud-hosted option, while removing the self-hosting burden, narrows the cost advantage over Zapier or Make at lower automation volumes
Verdict: Make vs n8n
Make and n8n both serve the AI Workflow Automation category well, but suit different priorities. Make carries the stronger editorial rating (4.3 / 5), Based on community engagement, Make is currently the more widely adopted choice (32 votes), but the better fit ultimately depends on your specific pricing, platform, and feature requirements.
Frequently Asked Questions
- Which is cheaper, Make or n8n?
- Make and n8n use a similar pricing model (both freemium), so the cheaper choice depends on which specific plan tier and feature set you need rather than the base pricing model.
- Is Make or n8n rated higher?
- Make has the higher editorial rating at 4.3 out of 5, compared to n8n's 4.2 out of 5. This is Kreemhunt's own staff rating, not a public user aggregate — review the pros and cons below for specifics that matter to your use case.
- Which platforms do Make and n8n support?
- Make is available on Web. n8n is available on Web. Both tools cover a similar range of platforms.
- Can I switch from Make to n8n (or vice versa)?
- Most ai workflow automation tools, including Make and n8n, support data export in standard formats, making migration possible though rarely fully automatic. Expect to manually verify that custom configurations, integrations, and historical data transfer correctly, and budget time for the team to adjust to workflow differences between the two products.
- Should I choose Make or n8n?
- Make and n8n both serve the AI Workflow Automation category well, but suit different priorities. Make carries the stronger editorial rating (4.3 / 5), Based on community engagement, Make is currently the more widely adopted choice (32 votes), but the better fit ultimately depends on your specific pricing, platform, and feature requirements.