Open-source CMS positioned between WordPress's simplicity and Drupal's deep customizability.
▲ 10
Visit →
Joomla vs WordPress
Comparing Joomla and WordPress to help you pick the right Content Management Systems for your needs.
| Feature | Joomla | WordPress |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Open Source | Free |
| Platforms | Web | Web |
| Editorial rating | ★ 3.7 / 5 | ★ 4 / 5 |
| Starting price | $0 | $0 |
| Community votes | 10 | 312 |
Joomla Pros & Cons
- More built-in structural flexibility than WordPress's core, without requiring Drupal's steeper, more developer-oriented learning curve
- Free and open-source with no licensing cost, similar to other major open-source CMS platforms
- Solid built-in user management and access control features useful for membership sites and intranets without needing extensive plugins
- Long operating history means a mature, stable core codebase refined over many years of development
- Multilingual support is more robust out of the box than WordPress's core, which historically relies more heavily on plugins for that capability
- Smaller plugin and extension ecosystem than WordPress's much larger, more dominant marketplace
- Market share and community size have shrunk relative to WordPress over the years, meaning fewer tutorials and community resources available
- Less beginner-friendly than WordPress for users with no prior CMS experience, despite being simpler than Drupal
- Fewer professional theme and design options readily available compared to WordPress's vast template marketplace
WordPress Pros & Cons
- The largest plugin and theme ecosystem of any CMS, covering nearly any feature need
- Free and open-source when self-hosted, with full code-level control
- Massive community means abundant tutorials, support, and developer availability
- Scales from simple blogs to complex enterprise sites with the right setup
- Self-hosted WordPress requires managing hosting, security updates, and backups
- Plugin quality varies widely, and poor plugin choices can hurt performance or security
- Can require ongoing maintenance attention compared to fully managed platforms like Squarespace
Verdict: Joomla vs WordPress
Joomla and WordPress both serve the Content Management Systems category well, but suit different priorities. WordPress carries the stronger editorial rating (4 / 5), Based on community engagement, WordPress is currently the more widely adopted choice (312 votes), but the better fit ultimately depends on your specific pricing, platform, and feature requirements.
Frequently Asked Questions
- Which is cheaper, Joomla or WordPress?
- Joomla and WordPress use a similar pricing model (both open-source), so the cheaper choice depends on which specific plan tier and feature set you need rather than the base pricing model.
- Is Joomla or WordPress rated higher?
- WordPress has the higher editorial rating at 4 out of 5, compared to Joomla's 3.7 out of 5. This is Kreemhunt's own staff rating, not a public user aggregate — review the pros and cons below for specifics that matter to your use case.
- Which platforms do Joomla and WordPress support?
- Joomla is available on Web. WordPress is available on Web. Both tools cover a similar range of platforms.
- Can I switch from Joomla to WordPress (or vice versa)?
- Most content management systems tools, including Joomla and WordPress, support data export in standard formats, making migration possible though rarely fully automatic. Expect to manually verify that custom configurations, integrations, and historical data transfer correctly, and budget time for the team to adjust to workflow differences between the two products.
- Should I choose Joomla or WordPress?
- Joomla and WordPress both serve the Content Management Systems category well, but suit different priorities. WordPress carries the stronger editorial rating (4 / 5), Based on community engagement, WordPress is currently the more widely adopted choice (312 votes), but the better fit ultimately depends on your specific pricing, platform, and feature requirements.