Open-source JavaScript library for interactive step-by-step product tours.
▲ 14
Visit →
Intro.js vs Shepherd.js
Comparing Intro.js and Shepherd.js to help you pick the right Product Tour & Onboarding Tools for your needs.
Open-source JavaScript tour library for guiding users through product features.
▲ 10
Visit →
| Feature | Intro.js | Shepherd.js |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Open Source | Open Source |
| Platforms | Web | Web |
| Editorial rating | ★ 4.1 / 5 | ★ 4 / 5 |
| Starting price | $0 | $0 |
| Community votes | 14 | 10 |
Intro.js Pros & Cons
- Free for personal use, affordable $9.99 commercial license
- Lightweight library that integrates with any JavaScript framework
- CSS customizable to match any design system
- Large community with extensive examples and documentation
- Requires developer implementation — not no-code
- More setup than SaaS alternatives like Appcues
- No analytics on tour completion without additional implementation
Shepherd.js Pros & Cons
- MIT licensed — fully free including commercial use
- Actively maintained with modern JavaScript support
- Better accessibility than Intro.js for screen reader compatibility
- Floating.js integration for accurate tooltip positioning
- Developer implementation required
- More complex API than Intro.js for simple tours
- Less documentation and examples than Intro.js community
Verdict: Intro.js vs Shepherd.js
Intro.js and Shepherd.js both serve the Product Tour & Onboarding Tools category well, but suit different priorities. Intro.js carries the stronger editorial rating (4.1 / 5), Based on community engagement, Intro.js is currently the more widely adopted choice (14 votes), but the better fit ultimately depends on your specific pricing, platform, and feature requirements.
Frequently Asked Questions
- Which is cheaper, Intro.js or Shepherd.js?
- Intro.js and Shepherd.js use a similar pricing model (both open-source), so the cheaper choice depends on which specific plan tier and feature set you need rather than the base pricing model.
- Is Intro.js or Shepherd.js rated higher?
- Intro.js has the higher editorial rating at 4.1 out of 5, compared to Shepherd.js's 4 out of 5. This is Kreemhunt's own staff rating, not a public user aggregate — review the pros and cons below for specifics that matter to your use case.
- Which platforms do Intro.js and Shepherd.js support?
- Intro.js is available on Web. Shepherd.js is available on Web. Both tools cover a similar range of platforms.
- Can I switch from Intro.js to Shepherd.js (or vice versa)?
- Most product tour & onboarding tools tools, including Intro.js and Shepherd.js, support data export in standard formats, making migration possible though rarely fully automatic. Expect to manually verify that custom configurations, integrations, and historical data transfer correctly, and budget time for the team to adjust to workflow differences between the two products.
- Should I choose Intro.js or Shepherd.js?
- Intro.js and Shepherd.js both serve the Product Tour & Onboarding Tools category well, but suit different priorities. Intro.js carries the stronger editorial rating (4.1 / 5), Based on community engagement, Intro.js is currently the more widely adopted choice (14 votes), but the better fit ultimately depends on your specific pricing, platform, and feature requirements.