Multi-factor authentication from Cisco for protecting enterprise applications.
▲ 20
Visit →
Duo Security vs OneLogin
Comparing Duo Security and OneLogin to help you pick the right Multi-Factor Authentication Software for your needs.
| Feature | Duo Security | OneLogin |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Freemium | Paid |
| Platforms | Web, iOS, Android | Web, iOS, Android |
| Editorial rating | ★ 4.2 / 5 | ★ 3.9 / 5 |
| Starting price | $0 | $4/month per user |
| Community votes | 20 | 11 |
Duo Security Pros & Cons
- Cisco backing provides enterprise credibility and reliability
- Push notifications make MFA seamless for end users
- Device Trust verifies device health before granting access
- Integrates with thousands of enterprise applications
- Can become expensive as user count grows at Enterprise tier
- Less feature-complete than full identity platforms like Okta
- Free tier limited to 10 users — not suitable for growing organizations
OneLogin Pros & Cons
- Generally priced lower than Okta at comparable feature tiers, a meaningful consideration for budget-conscious mid-market organizations
- Solid catalog of pre-built SSO integrations covering common business applications without requiring custom integration work
- Core SSO and MFA functionality covers the fundamental identity management needs most organizations require
- Mobile apps support identity management and authentication on the go for distributed or remote workforces
- Smaller app integration marketplace and overall brand recognition than Okta's much larger, more established presence
- Some users report a less polished, less intuitive admin interface than Okta's more refined administrative experience
- Less extensive advanced enterprise features than Okta for very large, complex organizational identity needs
- Acquisition by One Identity introduces some uncertainty about long-term product direction and integration priorities
Verdict: Duo Security vs OneLogin
Duo Security and OneLogin both serve the Multi-Factor Authentication Software category well, but suit different priorities. Duo Security is the more budget-friendly option, Duo Security carries the stronger editorial rating (4.2 / 5), Based on community engagement, Duo Security is currently the more widely adopted choice (20 votes), but the better fit ultimately depends on your specific pricing, platform, and feature requirements.
Frequently Asked Questions
- Which is cheaper, Duo Security or OneLogin?
- Duo Security is the more affordable option overall — it's offered as freemium, while OneLogin is paid. Check each tool's current pricing plans for exact figures, since promotional rates and annual discounts can shift the comparison.
- Is Duo Security or OneLogin rated higher?
- Duo Security has the higher editorial rating at 4.2 out of 5, compared to OneLogin's 3.9 out of 5. This is Kreemhunt's own staff rating, not a public user aggregate — review the pros and cons below for specifics that matter to your use case.
- Which platforms do Duo Security and OneLogin support?
- Duo Security is available on Web, iOS, Android. OneLogin is available on Web, iOS, Android. Both tools cover a similar range of platforms.
- Can I switch from Duo Security to OneLogin (or vice versa)?
- Most multi-factor authentication software tools, including Duo Security and OneLogin, support data export in standard formats, making migration possible though rarely fully automatic. Expect to manually verify that custom configurations, integrations, and historical data transfer correctly, and budget time for the team to adjust to workflow differences between the two products.
- Should I choose Duo Security or OneLogin?
- Duo Security and OneLogin both serve the Multi-Factor Authentication Software category well, but suit different priorities. Duo Security is the more budget-friendly option, Duo Security carries the stronger editorial rating (4.2 / 5), Based on community engagement, Duo Security is currently the more widely adopted choice (20 votes), but the better fit ultimately depends on your specific pricing, platform, and feature requirements.