Open-source no-code automation platform with self-hosting option.
▲ 18
Visit →
Activepieces vs Make
Comparing Activepieces and Make to help you pick the right AI Workflow Automation for your needs.
| Feature | Activepieces | Make |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |
| Platforms | Web | Web |
| Editorial rating | ★ 4.1 / 5 | ★ 4.3 / 5 |
| Starting price | $0 | $0 |
| Community votes | 18 | 32 |
Activepieces Pros & Cons
- Open-source self-hosted option provides unlimited automations at infrastructure cost
- Growing integration library covering most mainstream business tools
- Active development community with responsive maintainers
- MIT licensed — genuinely open source with no commercial restrictions
- Smaller integration ecosystem than Zapier or Make currently
- Self-hosting requires technical comfort for setup and maintenance
- Less mature than established competitors with some rough edges
Make Pros & Cons
- More complex workflow logic than Zapier with routers, iterators, and error handling
- More affordable per-operation pricing than Zapier at comparable workflow complexity
- Visual canvas shows complete workflow flow in a way linear Zapier steps do not
- Strong data transformation tools for manipulating data between steps
- Steeper learning curve than Zapier due to more complex interface
- Operation count can accumulate quickly in complex workflows with loops
- Less pre-built app integrations than Zapier, though covering most mainstream tools
Verdict: Activepieces vs Make
Activepieces and Make both serve the AI Workflow Automation category well, but suit different priorities. Make carries the stronger editorial rating (4.3 / 5), Based on community engagement, Make is currently the more widely adopted choice (32 votes), but the better fit ultimately depends on your specific pricing, platform, and feature requirements.
Frequently Asked Questions
- Which is cheaper, Activepieces or Make?
- Activepieces and Make use a similar pricing model (both freemium), so the cheaper choice depends on which specific plan tier and feature set you need rather than the base pricing model.
- Is Activepieces or Make rated higher?
- Make has the higher editorial rating at 4.3 out of 5, compared to Activepieces's 4.1 out of 5. This is Kreemhunt's own staff rating, not a public user aggregate — review the pros and cons below for specifics that matter to your use case.
- Which platforms do Activepieces and Make support?
- Activepieces is available on Web. Make is available on Web. Both tools cover a similar range of platforms.
- Can I switch from Activepieces to Make (or vice versa)?
- Most ai workflow automation tools, including Activepieces and Make, support data export in standard formats, making migration possible though rarely fully automatic. Expect to manually verify that custom configurations, integrations, and historical data transfer correctly, and budget time for the team to adjust to workflow differences between the two products.
- Should I choose Activepieces or Make?
- Activepieces and Make both serve the AI Workflow Automation category well, but suit different priorities. Make carries the stronger editorial rating (4.3 / 5), Based on community engagement, Make is currently the more widely adopted choice (32 votes), but the better fit ultimately depends on your specific pricing, platform, and feature requirements.