Infrastructure-as-Code Adoption Keeps Growing Despite Terraform Licensing Controversy
HashiCorp's 2023 license change for Terraform prompted a community fork, but adoption of infrastructure-as-code practices broadly has continued growing regardless of which specific tool teams choose.
The shift from manual cloud console configuration to declarative, version-controlled infrastructure has become close to a baseline expectation for serious engineering teams, independent of the specific licensing dispute around Terraform itself. Teams concerned about the 2023 Business Source License change have largely either accepted the new terms, evaluated the OpenTofu fork, or in some cases adopted alternative infrastructure-as-code tools entirely.
What hasn't slowed is the underlying practice: treating infrastructure changes with the same review and version-control discipline as application code remains the default recommendation for teams managing any meaningful cloud footprint, regardless of which specific tool implements that practice.
Our Terraform review covers the licensing situation and current ecosystem state in more detail.
Frequently asked questions
- When was this article about "Infrastructure-as-Code Adoption Keeps Growing Despite Terraform Licensing Controversy" published?
- This article was published on June 24, 2026. Kreemhunt dates every article so you can judge how current the information is.
- Where can I read a full review of Terraform?
- Kreemhunt maintains a full, regularly updated review of Terraform covering pricing, pros and cons, and alternatives in the Infrastructure as Code Tools category.
- Is this news article fact-checked?
- Yes. Kreemhunt's editorial team writes and reviews every article before publication. Where we report on claims made elsewhere, the original source is linked directly in the article.